# TLS Forward Secrecy in Postfix

## Warning

Forward secrecy does not protect against active attacks such as forged DNS replies or forged TLS server certificates. If such attacks are a concern, then the SMTP client will need to authenticate the remote SMTP server in a sufficiently-secure manner. For example, by the fingerprint of a (CA or leaf) public key or certificate. Conventional PKI relies on many trusted parties and is easily subverted by a state-funded adversary.

## Overview

Postfix supports forward secrecy of TLS network communication since version 2.2. This support was adopted from Lutz Jänicke's "Postfix TLS patch" for earlier Postfix versions. This document will focus on TLS Forward Secrecy in the Postfix SMTP client and server. See TLS_README for a general description of Postfix TLS support.

Topics covered in this document:

- Give me some background on forward secrecy in Postfix

  - What is Forward Secrecy
  - Forward Secrecy in TLS
  - Forward Secrecy in the Postfix SMTP Server
  - Forward Secrecy in the Postfix SMTP Client

- Never mind, just show me what it takes to get forward secrecy

  - Getting started, quick and dirty
  - How can I see that a connection has forward secrecy?
  - What ciphers provide forward secrecy?
  - What do "Anonymous", "Untrusted", etc. in Postfix logging mean?

- Credits

## What is Forward Secrecy

The term "Forward Secrecy" (or sometimes "Perfect Forward Secrecy") is used to describe security protocols in which the confidentiality of past traffic is not compromised when long-term keys used by either or both sides are later disclosed.

Forward secrecy is accomplished by negotiating session keys using per-session cryptographically-strong random numbers that are not saved, and signing the exchange with long-term authentication keys. Later disclosure of the long-term keys allows impersonation of the key holder from that point on, but not recovery of prior traffic, since with forward secrecy, the discarded random key agreement inputs are not available to the attacker.

Forward secrecy is only "perfect" when brute-force attacks on the key agreement algorithm are impractical even for the best-funded adversary and the random-number generators used by both parties are sufficiently strong. Otherwise, forward secrecy leaves the attacker with the challenge of cracking the key-agreement protocol, which is likely quite computationally intensive, but may be feasible for sessions of sufficiently high value. Thus forward secrecy places cost constraints on the efficacy of bulk surveillance, recovering all past traffic is generally infeasible, and even recovery of individual sessions may be infeasible given a sufficiently-strong key agreement method.

## Forward Secrecy in TLS

Early implementations of the SSL protocol do not provide forward secrecy (some provide it only with artificially-weakened "export" cipher suites, but we will ignore those here). The client sends a random "pre-master secret" to the server encrypted with the server's RSA public key. The server decrypts this with its private key, and uses it together with other data exchanged in the clear to generate the session key. An attacker with access to the server's private key can perform the same computation at any later time. The TLS library in Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 only supported cipher suites of this type, and Exchange 2003 servers largely do not support forward secrecy.

Later revisions to the TLS protocol introduced forward-secrecy cipher suites in which the client and server implement a key exchange protocol based on ephemeral secrets. Sessions encrypted with one of these newer cipher suites are not compromised by future disclosure of long-term authentication keys.

The key-exchange algorithms used for forward secrecy require the TLS server to designate appropriate "parameters" consisting of a mathematical "group" and an element of that group called a "generator". Presently, there are two flavors of "groups" that work with PFS:

- Prime-field groups (EDH): The server needs to be configured with a suitably-large prime and a corresponding "generator". The acronym for forward secrecy over prime fields is EDH for Ephemeral Diffie-Hellman (also abbreviated as DHE).

- Elliptic-curve groups (EECDH): The server needs to be configured with a "named curve". These offer better security at lower computational cost than prime field groups, but are not as widely implemented. The acronym for the elliptic curve version is EECDH which is short for Ephemeral Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (also abbreviated as ECDHE).

It is not essential to know what these are, but one does need to know that OpenSSL supports EECDH with version 1.0.0 or later. Thus the configuration parameters related to Elliptic-Curve forward secrecy are available when Postfix is linked with OpenSSL ≥ 1.0.0 (provided EC support has not been disabled by the vendor, as in some versions of RedHat Linux).

Elliptic curves used in cryptography are typically identified by a "name" that stands for a set of well-known parameter values, and it is these "names" (or associated ASN.1 object identifiers) that are used in the TLS protocol. On the other hand, with TLS there are no specially designated prime field groups, so each server is free to select its own suitably-strong prime and generator.

## Forward Secrecy in the Postfix SMTP Server

The Postfix ≥ 2.2 SMTP server supports forward secrecy in its default configuration. If the remote SMTP client prefers cipher suites with forward secrecy, then the traffic between the server and client will resist decryption even if the server's long-term authentication keys are later compromised.

Some remote SMTP clients may support forward secrecy, but prefer cipher suites without forward secrecy. In that case, Postfix ≥ 2.8 could be configured to ignore the client's preference with the main.cf setting "tls_preempt_cipherlist = yes". However, this will likely cause interoperability issues with older Exchange servers and is not recommended for now.

### EDH Server support

Postfix ≥ 2.2 support 1024-bit-prime EDH out of the box, with no additional configuration, but you may want to override the default prime to be 2048 bits long, and you may want to regenerate your primes periodically. See the quick-start section for details.

With prime-field EDH, OpenSSL wants the server to provide two explicitly-selected (prime, generator) combinations. One for the now long-obsolete "export" cipher suites, and another for non-export cipher suites. Postfix has two such default combinations compiled in, but also supports explicitly-configured overrides.

- The "export" EDH parameters are used only with the obsolete "export" ciphers. To use a non-default prime, generate a 512-bit DH parameter file and set smtpd_tls_dh512_param_file to the filename (see the quick-start section for details).

- The non-export EDH parameters are used for all other EDH cipher suites. To use a non-default prime, generate a 1024-bit or 2048-bit DH parameter file and set smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file to the filename. Despite the name this is simply the non-export parameter file and the prime need not actually be 1024 bits long (see the quick-start section for details).

It turns out that (inadvisably-patched in some Debian releases) Exim SMTP clients require a ≥ 2048-bit length for the non-export prime. See the quick-start section for the recommended configuration to work around this issue.

### EECDH Server support

Postfix ≥ 2.6 support NIST P-256 EECDH when built with OpenSSL ≥ 1.0.0. When the remote SMTP client also supports EECDH and implements the P-256 curve, forward secrecy just works.

> Note: With Postfix 2.6 and 2.7, enable EECDH by setting the main.cf parameter smtpd_tls_eecdh_grade to "strong".

The elliptic curve situation is evolving, with new curves being introduced to augment or replace the NIST curves tarnished by the Snowden revelations. Fortunately, TLS clients advertise the list of supported curves to the server so that servers can in principle choose newer stronger curves when mutually supported. The OpenSSL code for making this possible is not yet released as of late 2013 (it is available only in OpenSSL development snapshots).

At some point Postfix will need to adjust to the new API for setting the elliptic-curve options. Fortunately, when EECDH support was added to Postfix, it introduced a layer of indirection:

>         smtpd_tls_eecdh_grade = strong | ultra
>         tls_eecdh_strong_curve = prime256v1
>         tls_eecdh_ultra_curve = secp384r1

When it becomes possible in OpenSSL to support a "menu" of curves, we will likely extend "tls_eecdh_strong_curve" to be an ordered list of curves and likewise with the "ultra" version, where the two might now overlap, and differ mostly in the preference order. As a result most existing configurations will then support more curves at the desired security level without any changes to main.cf.

## Forward Secrecy in the Postfix SMTP Client

The Postfix ≥ 2.2 SMTP client supports forward secrecy in its default configuration. No configuration changes are needed besides turning on elliptic-curve support with Postfix 2.6 and 2.7 (see the quick-start section). If the remote SMTP server supports cipher suites with forward secrecy (and does not override the SMTP client's cipher preference), then the traffic between the server and client will resist decryption even if the server's long-term authentication keys are later compromised.

The default Postfix SMTP client cipher lists are correctly ordered to prefer EECDH and EDH cipher suites ahead of similar cipher suites that don't implement forward secrecy. Administrators are strongly discouraged from changing the cipher list definitions. It is likely safe to set "smtp_tls_ciphers = medium" if you wish to disable the obsolete "export" and "low" grade ciphers even with opportunistic TLS. Setting a minimum strength does not change the preference order. Note that strengths higher than "medium" exclude Exchange 2003 and likely other widely used MTAs, thus "high" grade ciphers should only be used on a case-by-case basis via the TLS policy table.

## Getting started, quick and dirty

### EECDH Client and server support (Postfix ≥ 2.6 with OpenSSL ≥ 1.0.0)

With Postfix 2.6 and 2.7, enable elliptic-curve support in the Postfix SMTP client and server. This is the default with Postfix ≥ 2.8. Note, however, that elliptic-curve support may be disabled by the vendor, as in some versions of RedHat Linux.

>     /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>         # Postfix 2.6 or 2.7 only. This is default with Postfix 2.8 and later.
>         smtpd_tls_eecdh_grade = strong

### EDH Client support (Postfix ≥ 2.2, all supported OpenSSL versions)

This works "out of the box" without additional configuration.

### EDH Server support (Postfix ≥ 2.2, all supported OpenSSL versions)

Optionally generate non-default Postfix SMTP server EDH parameters for improved security against pre-computation attacks and for compatibility with Debian-patched Exim SMTP clients that require a ≥ 2048-bit length for the non-export prime.

Execute as root (prime group generation can take a few seconds to a few minutes):

>     # cd /etc/postfix
>     # umask 022
>     # openssl dhparam -out dh512.tmp 512 && mv dh512.tmp dh512.pem
>     # openssl dhparam -out dh1024.tmp 1024 && mv dh1024.tmp dh1024.pem
>     # openssl dhparam -out dh2048.tmp 2048 && mv dh2048.tmp dh2048.pem
>     # chmod 644 dh512.pem dh1024.pem dh2048.pem

The Postfix SMTP server EDH parameter files are not secret, after all these parameters are sent to all remote SMTP clients in the clear. Mode 0644 is fine.

You can improve security against pre-computation attacks further by regenerating the Postfix SMTP server EDH parameters periodically (an hourly or daily cron job running the above commands as root can automate this task).

Once the parameters are in place, update main.cf as follows:

>     /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>         smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file = ${config_directory}/dh2048.pem
>         smtpd_tls_dh512_param_file = ${config_directory}/dh512.pem

If some of your MSA clients don't support 2048-bit EDH, you may need to adjust the submission entry in master.cf accordingly:

>     /etc/postfix/master.cf:
>         submission inet n       -       n       -       -       smtpd
>             # Some submission clients may not yet do 2048-bit EDH, if such
>             # clients use your MSA, configure 1024-bit EDH instead:
>             -o smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file=${config_directory}/dh1024.pem
>             -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
>             -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
>             ...

## How can I see that a connection has forward secrecy?

Postfix can be configured to report information about the negotiated cipher, the corresponding key lengths, and the remote peer certificate or public-key verification status.

- With "smtp_tls_loglevel = 1" and "smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1", the Postfix SMTP client and server will log TLS connection information to the maillog file. The general logfile format is:

  >     postfix/smtp[process-id]: Untrusted TLS connection established
  >     to host.example.com[192.168.0.2]:25: TLSv1 with cipher cipher-name
  >     (actual-key-size/raw-key-size bits)

  >     postfix/smtpd[process-id]: Anonymous TLS connection established
  >     from host.example.com[192.168.0.2]: TLSv1 with cipher cipher-name
  >     (actual-key-size/raw-key-size bits)

- With "smtpd_tls_received_header = yes", the Postfix SMTP server will record TLS connection information in the Received: header in the form of comments (text inside parentheses). The general format depends on the smtpd_tls_ask_ccert setting:

  >     Received: from host.example.com (host.example.com [192.168.0.2])
  >             (using TLSv1 with cipher cipher-name
  >             (actual-key-size/raw-key-size bits))
  >             (Client CN "host.example.com", Issuer "John Doe" (not verified))

  >     Received: from host.example.com (host.example.com [192.168.0.2])
  >             (using TLSv1 with cipher cipher-name
  >             (actual-key-size/raw-key-size bits))
  >             (No client certificate requested)

The next sections will explain what cipher-name, key-size, and peer verification status information to expect.

## What ciphers provide forward secrecy?

There are dozens of ciphers that support forward secrecy. What follows is the beginning of a list of 51 ciphers available with OpenSSL 1.0.1e. The list is sorted in the default Postfix preference order. It excludes null ciphers that only authenticate and don't encrypt, together with export and low-grade ciphers whose encryption is too weak to offer meaningful secrecy. The first column shows the cipher name, and the second shows the key exchange method.

>     $ openssl ciphers -v \
>             'aNULL:-aNULL:kEECDH:kEDH:+RC4:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!LOW:@STRENGTH' |
>         awk '{printf "%-32s %s\n", $1, $3}'
>     AECDH-AES256-SHA                 Kx=ECDH
>     ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384      Kx=ECDH
>     ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384    Kx=ECDH
>     ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384          Kx=ECDH
>     ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384        Kx=ECDH
>     ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA             Kx=ECDH
>     ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA           Kx=ECDH
>     ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384            Kx=DH
>     ADH-AES256-SHA256                Kx=DH
>     ADH-AES256-SHA                   Kx=DH
>     ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA              Kx=DH
>     DHE-DSS-AES256-GCM-SHA384        Kx=DH
>     DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384        Kx=DH
>     DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256            Kx=DH
>     ...

To date, all ciphers that support forward secrecy have one of five values for the first component of their OpenSSL name: "AECDH", "ECDHE", "ADH", "EDH" or "DHE". Ciphers that don't implement forward secrecy have names that don't start with one of these prefixes. This pattern is likely to persist until some new key-exchange mechanism is invented that also supports forward secrecy.

The actual key length and raw algorithm key length are generally the same with non-export ciphers, but may they differ for the legacy export ciphers where the actual key is artificially shortened.

## What do "Anonymous", "Untrusted", etc. in Postfix logging mean?

The verification levels below are subject to man-in-the-middle attacks to different degrees. If such attacks are a concern, then the SMTP client will need to authenticate the remote SMTP server in a sufficiently-secure manner. For example, by the fingerprint of a (CA or leaf) public key or certificate. Remember that conventional PKI relies on many trusted parties and is easily subverted by a state-funded adversary.

Anonymous (no peer certificate)

  Postfix SMTP client: With opportunistic TLS (the "may" security level) the Postfix SMTP client does not verify any information in the peer certificate. In this case it enables and prefers anonymous cipher suites in which the remote SMTP server does not present a certificate (these ciphers offer forward secrecy of necessity). When the remote SMTP server also supports anonymous TLS, and agrees to such a cipher suite, the verification status will be logged as "Anonymous".

  Postfix SMTP server: This is by far most common, as client certificates are optional, and the Postfix SMTP server does not request client certificates by default (see smtpd_tls_ask_ccert). Even when client certificates are requested, the remote SMTP client might not send a certificate. Unlike the Postfix SMTP client, the Postfix SMTP server "anonymous" verification status does not imply that the cipher suite is anonymous, which corresponds to the server not sending a certificate.

Untrusted (peer certificate not signed by trusted CA)

  Postfix SMTP client: The remote SMTP server presented a certificate, but the Postfix SMTP client was unable to check the issuing CA signature. With opportunistic TLS this is common with remote SMTP servers that don't support anonymous cipher suites.

  Postfix SMTP server: The remote SMTP client presented a certificate, but the Postfix SMTP server was unable to check the issuing CA signature. This can happen when the server is configured to request client certificates (see smtpd_tls_ask_ccert).

Trusted (peer certificate signed by trusted CA, unverified peer name)

  Postfix SMTP client: The remote SMTP server's certificate was signed by a CA that the Postfix SMTP client trusts, but either the client was not configured to verify the destination server name against the certificate, or the server certificate did not contain any matching names. This is common with opportunistic TLS (smtp_tls_security_level is "may" or else "dane" with no usable TLSA DNS records) when the Postfix SMTP client's trusted CAs can verify the authenticity of the remote SMTP server's certificate, but the client is not configured or unable to verify the server name.

  Postfix SMTP server: The remote SMTP client certificate was signed by a CA that the Postfix SMTP server trusts. The Postfix SMTP server never verifies the remote SMTP client name against the names in the client certificate. Since the client chooses to connect to the server, the Postfix SMTP server has no expectation of a particular client hostname.

Verified (peer certificate signed by trusted CA and verified peer name; or: peer certificate with expected public-key or certificate fingerprint)

  Postfix SMTP client: The remote SMTP server's certificate was signed by a CA that the Postfix SMTP client trusts, and the certificate name matches the destination or server name(s). The Postfix SMTP client was configured to require a verified name, otherwise the verification status would have been just "Trusted".

  Postfix SMTP client: The "Verified" status may also mean that the Postfix SMTP client successfully matched the expected fingerprint against the remote SMTP server public key or certificate. The expected fingerprint may come from smtp_tls_policy_maps or from TLSA (secure) DNS records. The Postfix SMTP client ignores the CA signature.

  Postfix SMTP server: The status is never "Verified", because the Postfix SMTP server never verifies the remote SMTP client name against the names in the client certificate, and because the Postfix SMTP does not expect a specific fingerprint in the client public key or certificate.

## Credits

- TLS support for Postfix was originally developed by Lutz Jänicke at Cottbus Technical University.
- Wietse Venema adopted and restructured the code and documentation.
- Viktor Dukhovni implemented support for many subsequent TLS features, including EECDH, and authored the initial version of this document.