





Network Working Group                                        J. Garrett
Request for Comments: 1433                       AT&T Bell Laboratories
                                                               J. Hagan
                                             University of Pennsylvania
                                                                J. Wong
                                                 AT&T Bell Laboratories
                                                             March 1993


                              Directed ARP

Status of this Memo

   This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
   community.  Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
   Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol
   Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.
   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

   A router with an interface to two IP networks via the same link level
   interface could observe that the two IP networks share the same link
   level network, and could advertise that information to hosts (via
   ICMP Redirects) and routers (via dynamic routing protocols).
   However, a host or router on only one of the IP networks could not
   use that information to communicate directly with hosts and routers
   on the other IP network unless it could resolve IP addresses on the
   "foreign" IP network to their corresponding link level addresses.
   Directed ARP is a dynamic address resolution procedure that enables
   hosts and routers to resolve advertised potential next-hop IP
   addresses on foreign IP networks to their associated link level
   addresses.

Acknowledgments

   The authors are indebted to Joel Halpern of Network Systems
   Corporation and David O'Leary who provided valuable comments and
   insight to the authors, as well as ongoing moral support as the
   presentation of this material evolved through many drafts.  Members
   of the IPLPDN working group also provided valuable comments during
   presentations and through the IPLPDN mailing list.  Chuck Hedrick of
   Rutgers University, Paul Tsuchiya of Bell Communications Research,
   and Doris Tillman of AT&T Bell Laboratories provided early insight as
   well as comments on early drafts.






Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                           [Page 1]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


1.  Terminology

   A "link level network" is the upper layer of what is sometimes
   referred to (e.g., OSI parlance) as the "subnetwork", i.e., the
   layers below IP.  The term "link level" is used to avoid potential
   confusion with the term "IP sub-network", and to identify addresses
   (i.e., "link level address") associated with the network used to
   transport IP datagrams.

   From the perspective of a host or router, an IP network is "foreign"
   if the host or router does not have an address on the IP network.

2.  Introduction

   Multiple IP networks may be administered on the same link level
   network (e.g., on a large public data network).  A router with a
   single interface on two IP networks could use existing routing update
   procedures to advertise that the two IP networks shared the same link
   level network.  Cost/performance benefits could be achieved if hosts
   and routers that were not on the same IP network could use that
   advertised information, and exchange packets directly, rather than
   through the dual addressed router.  But a host or router can not send
   packets directly to an IP address without first resolving the IP
   address to its link level address.

   IP address resolution procedures are established independently for
   each IP network.  For example, on an SMDS network [1], address
   resolution may be achieved using the Address Resolution Protocol
   (ARP) [2], with a separate SMDS ARP Request Address (e.g., an SMDS
   Multicast Group Address) associated with each IP network.  A host or
   router that was not configured with the appropriate ARP Request
   Address would have no way to learn the ARP Request Address associated
   with an IP network, and would not send an ARP Request to the
   appropriate ARP Request Address.  On an Ethernet network a host or
   router might guess that an IP address could be resolved by sending an
   ARP Request to the broadcast address.  But if the IP network used a
   different address resolution procedure (e.g., administered address
   resolution tables), the ARP Request might go unanswered.

   Directed ARP is a procedure that enables a router advertising that an
   IP address is on a shared link level network to also aid in resolving
   the IP address to its associated link level address.  By removing
   address resolution constraints, Directed ARP enables dynamic routing
   protocols such as BGP [3] and OSPF [4] to advertise and use routing
   information that leads to next-hop addresses on "foreign" IP
   networks.  In addition, Directed ARP enables routers to advertise
   (via ICMP Redirects) next-hop addresses that are "foreign" to hosts,
   since the hosts can use Directed ARP to resolve the "foreign" next-



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                           [Page 2]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


   hop addresses.

3.  Directed ARP

   Directed ARP uses the normal ARP packet format, and is consistent
   with ARP procedures, as defined in [1] and [2], and with routers and
   hosts that implement those procedures.

3.1  ARP Helper Address

   Hosts and routers maintain routing information, logically organized
   as a routing table.  Each routing table entry associates one or more
   destination IP addresses with a next-hop IP address and a physical
   interface used to forward a packet to the next-hop IP address.  If
   the destination IP address is local (i.e., can be reached without the
   aid of a router), the next-hop IP address is NULL (or a logical
   equivalent, such as the IP address of the associated physical
   interface).  Otherwise, the next-hop IP address is the address of a
   next-hop router.

   A host or router that implements Directed ARP procedures associates
   an ARP Helper Address with each routing table entry.  If the host or
   router has been configured to resolve the next-hop IP address to its
   associated link level address (or to resolve the destination IP
   address, if the next-hop IP address is NULL), the associated ARP
   Helper Address is NULL.  Otherwise, the ARP Helper Address is the IP
   address of the router that provided the routing information
   indicating that the next-hop address was on the same link level
   network as the associated physical interface.  Section 4 provides
   detailed examples of the determination of ARP Helper Addresses by
   dynamic routing procedures.

3.2  Address Resolution Procedures

   To forward an IP packet, a host or router searches its routing table
   for an entry that is the best match based on the destination IP
   address and perhaps other factors (e.g., Type of Service).  The
   selected routing table entry includes the IP address of a next-hop
   router (which may be NULL), the physical interface through which the
   IP packet should be forwarded, an ARP Helper Address (which may be
   NULL), and other information.  The routing function passes the next-
   hop IP address, the physical interface, and the ARP Helper Address to
   the address resolution function.  The address resolution function
   must then resolve the next-hop IP address (or destination IP address
   if the next-hop IP address is NULL) to its associated link level
   address.  The IP packet, the link level address to which the packet
   should be forwarded, and the interface through which the packet
   should be forwarded are then passed to the link level driver



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                           [Page 3]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


   associated with the physical interface.  The link level driver
   encapsulates the IP packet in one or more link level frames (i.e.,
   may do fragmentation) addressed to the associated link level address,
   and forwards the frame(s) through the appropriate physical interface.
   The details of the functions performed are described via C pseudo-
   code below.

   The procedures are organized as two functions, Route() and Resolve(),
   corresponding to routing and address resolution.  In addition, the
   following low level functions are also used:

     Get_Route(IP_Add,Other) returns a pointer to the routing table
      entry with the destination field that best matches IP_Add.  If no
      matching entry is found, NULL is returned.  Other information such
      as Type of Service may be considered in selecting the best route.

     Forward(Packet,Link_Level_Add,Phys_Int) fragments Packet (if
      needed), and encapsulates Packet in one or more Link Level Frames
      addressed to Link_Level_Add, and forwards the frame(s) through
      interface, Phys_Int.

     Look_Up_Add_Res_Table(IP_Add,Phys_Int) returns a pointer to the
      link level address associated with IP_Add in the address
      resolution table associated with interface, Phys_Int.  If IP_Add
      is not found in the address resolution table, NULL is returned.

     Local_Add_Res(IP_Add,Phys_Int) returns a pointer to the Link Level
      address associated with IP_Add, using address resolution
      procedures associated with address, IP_Add, and interface,
      Phys_Int.  If address resolution is unsuccessful, NULL is
      returned.  Note that different address resolution procedures may
      be used for different IP networks.

     Receive_ARP_Response(IP_Add,Phys_Int) returns a pointer to an ARP
      Response received through interface, Phys_Int, that resolves
      IP_Add.  If no ARP response is received, NULL is returned.

     Dest_IP_Add(IP_Packet) returns the IP destination address from
      IP_Packet.

     Next_Hop(Entry) returns the IP address in the next-hop field of
      (routing table) Entry.

     Interface(Entry) returns the physical interface field of (routing
      table) Entry.

     ARP_Helper_Add(Entry) returns the IP address in the ARP Helper
      Address field of (routing table) Entry.



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                           [Page 4]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


     ARP_Request(IP_Add) returns an ARP Request packet with IP_Add as
      the Target IP address.

     Source_Link_Level(ARP_Response) returns the link level address of
      the sender of ARP_Response.




   ROUTE(IP_Packet)
   {
   Entry = Get_Route(Dest_IP_Add(IP_Packet),Other(IP_Packet));
   If (Entry == NULL)  /* No matching entry in routing table */
     Return;  /*  Discard IP_Packet */
   else
     {  /* Resolve next-hop IP address to link level address */
     If (Next_Hop(Entry) != NULL) /* Route packet via next-hop router */
       Next_IP = Next_Hop(Entry);
     else  /* Destination is local */
       Next_IP = Dest_IP_Add(IP_Packet);
     L_L_Add = Resolve(Next_IP,Interface(Entry),ARP_Helper_Add(Entry));
     If (L_L_Add != NULL)
       Forward(IP_Packet,L_L_Add,Interface(Entry));
     else  /* Couldn't resolve next-hop IP address */
       Return;  /* Discard IP_Packet */
     Return;
     }
   }

   Figure 1:  C Pseudo-Code for the Routing function.





















Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                           [Page 5]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


   Resolve(IP_Add,Interface,ARP_Help_Add)
   {
   If ((L_L_Add = Look_Up_Add_Res_Table(IP_Add,Interface)) != NULL)
     {   /* Found it in Address Resolution Table */
     Return L_L_Add;
     }
   else
     {
     If (ARP_Help_Add == NULL)
       {  /* Do local Address Resolution Procedure */
       Return Local_Add_Res(IP_Add,Interface);
       }
     else  /* ARP_Help_Add != NULL */
       {
       L_L_ARP_Help_Add = Look_Up_Add_Res_Table(ARP_Help_Add,Interface);
       If (L_L_ARP_Help_Add == NULL)
                              /* Not in Address Resolution Table */
         L_L_ARP_Help_Add = Local_Add_Res(ARP_Help_Add,Interface);
       If (L_L_ARP_Help_Add == NULL)  /* Can't Resolve ARP Helper Add */
         Return NULL;  /*  Address Resolution Failed */
       else
         {  /* ARP for IP_Add */
         Forward(ARP_Request(IP_Add),L_L_ARP_Help_Add,Interface);
         ARP_Resp = Receive_ARP_Response(IP_Add,Interface);
         If (ARP_Resp == NULL) /* No ARP Response (after persistence) */
           Return NULL;  /* Address Resolution Failed */
         else
           Return Source_Link_Level(ARP_Resp);
           }
         }
       }
     }
   }

   Figure 2:  C Pseudo-Code for Address Resolution function.



3.3  Forwarding ARP Requests

   A host that implements Directed ARP procedures uses normal procedures
   to process received ARP Requests.  That is, if the Target IP address
   is the host's address, the host uses normal procedures to respond to
   the ARP Request.  If the Target IP address is not the host's address,
   the host silently discards the ARP Request.

   If the Target IP address of an ARP Request received by a router is
   the router's address, the router uses normal procedures to respond to



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                           [Page 6]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


   the ARP Request.  But if the Target IP address is not the router's
   address, the router may forward the ARP Request back through the same
   interface it was received from, addressed to a Link Level Address
   that corresponds to an ARP Helper Address in the router's routing
   table.  The procedures used to process an ARP Request are described
   via C pseudo-code below.  The function Receive() describes procedures
   followed by hosts and routers, and the function Direct() describes
   additional procedures followed by routers.  In addition, the
   following low level functions are also used:

     Is_Local_IP_Add(IP_Add,Phys_Int) returns TRUE if Phys_Int has been
      assigned IP address, IP_Add.  Otherwise, returns FALSE.

     Do_ARP_Processing(ARP_Request,Interface) processes ARP_Request
      using ARP procedures described in [2].

     I_Am_Router returns TRUE if device is a router and False if device
      is a host.

     Target_IP(ARP_Request) returns the Target IP address from
      ARP_Request.

     Filter(ARP_Request,Phys_Int) returns TRUE if ARP_Request passes
      filtering constraints, and FALSE if filtering constraints are not
      passed.  See section 3.4.

     Forward(Packet,Link_Level_Add,Phys_Int) fragments Packet (if
      needed), and encapsulates Packet in one or more Link Level Frames
      addressed to Link_Level_Add, and forwards the frame(s) through
      interface, Phys_Int.

     Look_Up_Next_Hop_Route_Table(IP_Add) returns a pointer to the
      routing table entry with the next-hop field that matches IP_Add.
      If no matching entry is found, NULL is returned.

     Look_Up_Dest_Route_Table(IP_Add) returns a pointer to the routing
      table entry with the destination field that best matches IP_Add.
      If no matching entry is found, NULL is returned.

     Link_Level_ARP_Req_Add(IP_Add,Phys_Int) returns the link level
      address to which an ARP Request to resolve IP_Add should be
      forwarded.  If ARP is not used to perform local address resolution
      of IP_Add, NULL is returned.

     Local_Add_Res(IP_Add,Phys_Int) returns a pointer to the Link Level
      address associated with IP_Add, using address resolution
      procedures associated with address, IP_Add, and interface,
      Phys_Int.  If address resolution is unsuccessful, NULL is



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                           [Page 7]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


      returned.  Note that different address resolution procedures may
      be used for different IP networks.

     Next_Hop(Entry) returns the IP address in the next-hop field of
      (routing table) Entry.

     Interface(Entry) returns the physical interface field of (routing
      table) Entry.

     ARP_Helper_Add(Entry) returns the IP address in the ARP Helper
      Address field of (routing table) Entry.

     Source_Link_Level(ARP_Request) returns the link level address of
      the sender of ARP_Request.





   Receive(ARP_Request,Interface)
   {
   If (Is_Local_IP_Add(Target_IP(ARP_Request),Interface))
     Do_ARP_Processing(ARP_Request,Interface);
   else  /*  Not my IP Address  */
     If (I_Am_Router)  /*  Hosts don't Direct ARP Requests  */
       If (Filter(ARP_Request,Interface))  /*  Passes Filter Test  */
                                           /*  See Section 3.4  */
         Direct(ARP_Request,Interface);  /*  Directed ARP Procedures  */
   Return;
   }

   Figure 3:  C Pseudo-Code for Receiving ARP Requests.



















Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                           [Page 8]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


   Direct(ARP_Request,Phys_Int)
   {
   Entry = Look_Up_Next_Hop_Route_Table(Target_IP(ARP_Request));
   If (Entry == NULL)  /* Target_IP Address is not a next-hop */
     {                 /*  in Routing Table */
     Entry = Look_Up_Dest_Route_Table(Target_IP(ARP_Request));
       If (Entry == NULL)  /* Not a destination either */
         Return;  /* Discard ARP Request */
       else
         If (Next_Hop(Entry) != NULL) /* Not a next-hop and Not local */
           Return;  /* Discard ARP Request */
     }
   If (Interface(Entry) != Phys_Int)
                            /* Must be same physical interface */
     Return;  /* Discard ARP Request */
   If (ARP_Helper_Add(Entry) != NULL)
     {
     L_L_ARP_Helper_Add = Resolve(ARP_Helper_Add(Entry),Phys_Int,NULL);
     If (L_L_ARP_Helper_Add != NULL)
       Forward(ARP_Request,L_L_ARP_Helper_Add,Phys_Int);
         /*  Forward ARP_Request to ARP Helper Address  */
     Return;
     }
   else  /*  Do local address resolution.  */
     {
     L_L_ARP_Req_Add =
                Link_Level_ARP_Req_Add(Target_IP(ARP_Request),Phys_Int);
     If (L_L_ARP_Req_Add != NULL)
       {  /*  Local address resolution procedure is ARP. */
          /*  Forward ARP_Request. */
       Forward(ARP_Request,L_L_ARP_Req_Add,Phys_Int);
       Return;
       }
     else
       {  /*  Local address resolution procedure is not ARP.  */
          /*  Do "published ARP" on behalf of Target IP Address  */
       Target_Link_Level =
                      Local_Add_Res(Target_IP(ARP_Request),Phys_Int);
       If (Target_Link_Level != NULL)  /*  Resolved Address  */
         {
         Forward(ARP_Response,Source_Link_Level(ARP_Request),Phys_Int);
         }
       Return;
       }
     }
   }

   Figure 4:  C Pseudo_Code for Directing ARP Requests.



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                           [Page 9]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


3.4  Filtering Procedures

   A router performing Directed ARP procedures must filter the
   propagation of ARP Request packets to constrain the scope of
   potential "ARP floods" caused by misbehaving routers or hosts, and to
   terminate potential ARP loops that may occur during periods of
   routing protocol instability or as a result of inappropriate manual
   configurations.  Specific procedures to filter the propagation of ARP
   Request packets are beyond the scope of this document.  The following
   procedures are suggested as potential implementations that should be
   sufficient.  Other procedures may be better suited to a particular
   implementation.

   To control the propagation of an "ARP flood", a router performing
   Directed ARP procedures could limit the number of identical ARP
   Requests (i.e., same Source IP address and same Target IP address)
   that it would forward per small time interval (e.g., no more than one
   ARP Request per second).  This is consistent with the procedure
   suggested in [5] to prevent ARP flooding.

   Forwarding of ARP Request packets introduces the possibility of ARP
   loops.  The procedures used to control the scope of potential ARP
   floods may terminate some ARP loops, but additional procedures are
   needed if the time required to traverse a loop is longer than the
   timer used to control ARP floods.  A router could refuse to forward
   more than N identical ARP Requests per T minutes, where N and T are
   administered numbers.  If T and N are chosen so that T/N minutes is
   greater than the maximum time required to traverse a loop, such a
   filter would terminate the loop.  In some cases a host may send more
   than one ARP Request with the same Source IP address,Target IP
   address pair (i.e., N should be greater than 1).  For example, the
   first ARP Request might be lost.  However, once an ARP Response is
   received, a host would normally save the associated information, and
   therefore would not generate an identical ARP Request for a period of
   time on the order of minutes.  Therefore, T may be large enough to
   ensure that T/N is much larger than the time to traverse any loop.

   In some implementations the link level destination address of a frame
   used to transport an ARP Request to a router may be available to the
   router's Directed ARP filtering process.  An important class of
   simple ARP loops will be prevented from starting if a router never
   forwards an ARP Request to the same link level address to which the
   received ARP Request was addressed.  Of course, other procedures such
   as the one described in the paragraph above will stop all loops, and
   are needed, even if filters are implemented that prevent some loops
   from starting.





Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                          [Page 10]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


   Host requirements [5] specify that "the packet receive interface
   between the IP layer and the link layer MUST include a flag to
   indicate whether the incoming packet was addressed to a link-level
   broadcast address."  An important class of simple ARP floods can be
   eliminated if routers never forward ARP Requests that were addressed
   to a link-level broadcast address.

4.  Use of Directed ARP by Routing

   The exchange and use of routing information is constrained by
   available address resolution procedures.  A host or router can not
   use a next-hop IP address learned via dynamic routing procedures if
   it is unable to resolve the next-hop IP address to the associated
   link level address.  Without compatible dynamic address resolution
   procedures, a router may not advertise a next-hop address that is not
   on the same IP network as the host or router receiving the
   advertisement.  Directed ARP is a procedure that enables a router
   that advertises routing information to make the routing information
   useful by also providing assistance in resolving the associated
   next-hop IP addresses.

   The following subsections describe the use of Directed ARP to expand
   the scope of ICMP Redirects [6], distance-vector routing protocols
   (e.g., BGP [3]), and link-state routing protocols (e.g., OSPF [4]).

4.1  ICMP Redirect

   If a router forwards a packet to a next-hop address that is on the
   same link level network as the host that originated the packet, the
   router may send an ICMP Redirect to the host.  But a host can not use
   a next-hop address advertised via an ICMP Redirect unless the host
   has a procedure to resolve the advertised next-hop address to its
   associated link level address.  Directed ARP is a procedure that a
   host could use to resolve an advertised next-hop address, even if the
   host does not have an address on the same IP network as the
   advertised next-hop address.

   A host that implements Directed ARP procedures includes an ARP Helper
   Address with each routing table entry.  The ARP Helper Address
   associated with an entry learned via an ICMP Redirect is NULL if the
   associated next-hop address matches a routing table entry with a NULL
   next-hop and a NULL ARP Helper Address (i.e., the host already knows
   how to resolve the next-hop address).  Otherwise, the ARP Helper
   Address is the IP address of the router that sent the ICMP Redirect.
   Note that the router that sent the ICMP Redirect is the current
   next-hop to the advertised destination [5].  Therefore, the host
   should have an entry in its address resolution table for the new ARP
   Helper Address.  If the host is unable to resolve the next-hop IP



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                          [Page 11]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


   address advertised in the ICMP Redirect (e.g., because the associated
   ARP Helper Address is on a foreign IP network; i.e., was learned via
   an old ICMP Redirect, and the address resolution table entry for that
   ARP Helper Address timed out), the host must flush the associated
   routing table entry.  Directed ARP procedures do not recursively use
   Directed ARP to resolve an ARP Helper Address.

   A router that performs Directed ARP procedures might advertise a
   foreign next-hop to a host that does not perform Directed ARP.
   Following existing procedures, the host would silently discard the
   ICMP Redirect.  A router that does not implement Directed ARP should
   not advertise a next-hop on a foreign IP network, as specified by
   existing procedures.  If it did, and the ICMP Redirect was received
   by a host that implemented Directed ARP procedures, the host would
   send an ARP Request for the foreign IP address to the advertising
   router, which would silently discard the ARP Request.  When address
   resolution fails, the host should flush the associated entry from its
   routing table.

   For various reasons a host may ignore an ICMP Redirect and may
   continue to forward packets to the same router that sent the ICMP
   Redirect.  For example, a host that does not implement Directed ARP
   procedures would silently discard an ICMP Redirect advertising a
   next-hop address on a foreign IP network.  Routers should implement
   constraints to control the number of ICMP Redirects sent to hosts.
   For example, a router might limit the number of repeated ICMP
   Redirects sent to a host to no more than N ICMP Redirects per T
   minutes, where N and T are administered values.

4.2  Distance Vector Routing Protocol

   A distance-vector routing protocol provides procedures for a router
   to advertise a destination address (e.g., an IP network), an
   associated next-hop address, and other information (e.g., associated
   metric).  But a router can not use an advertised route unless the
   router has a procedure to resolve the advertised next-hop address to
   its associated link level address.  Directed ARP is a procedure that
   a router could use to resolve an advertised next-hop address, even if
   the router does not have an address on the same IP network as the
   advertised next-hop address.

   The following procedures assume a router only accepts routing updates
   if it knows the IP address of the sender of the update, can resolve
   the IP address of the sender to its associated link level address,
   and has an interface on the same link level network as the sender.

   A router that implements Directed ARP procedures includes an ARP
   Helper Address with each routing table entry.  The ARP Helper Address



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                          [Page 12]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


   associated with an entry learned via a routing protocol update is
   NULL if the associated next-hop address matches a routing table entry
   with a NULL next-hop and NULL ARP Helper Address (i.e., the router
   already knows how to resolve the next-hop address).  Otherwise, the
   ARP Helper Address is the IP address of the router that sent the
   routing update.

   Some distance-vector routing protocols (e.g., BGP [3]) provide syntax
   that would permit a router to advertise an address on a foreign IP
   network as a next-hop.  If a router that implements Directed ARP
   procedures advertises a foreign next-hop IP address to a second
   router that does not implement Directed ARP procedures, the second
   router can not use the advertised foreign next-hop.  Depending on the
   details of the routing protocol implementation, it might be
   appropriate for the first router to also advertise a next-hop that is
   not on a foreign IP network (e.g., itself), perhaps at a higher cost.
   Or, if the routing relationship is an administered connection (e.g.,
   BGP relationships are administered TCP/IP connections), the
   administrative procedure could determine whether foreign next-hop IP
   addresses should be advertised.

   A distance-vector routing protocol could advertise that a destination
   is directly reachable by specifying that the router receiving the
   advertisement is, itself, the next-hop to the destination.  In
   addition, the advertised metric for the route might be zero.  If the
   router did not already have a routing table entry that specified the
   advertised destination was local (i.e., NULL next-hop address), the
   router could add the new route with NULL next-hop, and the IP address
   of the router that sent the update as ARP Helper Address.

4.3  Link State Routing Protocol

   A link-state routing protocol provides procedures for routers to
   identify links to other entities (e.g., other routers and networks),
   determine the state or cost of those links, reliably distribute
   link-state information to other routers in the routing domain, and
   calculate routes based on link-state information received from other
   routers.  A router with an interface to two (or more) IP networks via
   the same link level interface is connected to those IP networks via a
   single link, as described above.  If a router could advertise that it
   used the same link to connect to two (or more) IP networks, and would
   perform Directed ARP procedures, routers on either of the IP networks
   could forward packets directly to hosts and routers on both IP
   networks, using Directed ARP procedures to resolve addresses on the
   foreign IP network.  With Directed ARP, the cost of the direct path
   to the foreign IP network would be less than the cost of the path
   through the router with addresses on both IP networks.




Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                          [Page 13]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


   To benefit from Directed ARP procedures, the link-state routing
   protocol must include procedures for a router to advertise
   connectivity to multiple IP networks via the same link, and the
   routing table calculation process must include procedures to
   calculate ARP Helper Addresses and procedures to accurately calculate
   the reduced cost of the path to a foreign IP network reached directly
   via Directed ARP procedures.

   The Shortest Path First algorithm for calculating least cost routes
   is based on work by Dijkstra [7], and was first used in a routing
   protocol by the ARPANET, as described by McQuillan [8].  A router
   constructs its routing table by building a shortest path tree, with
   itself as root.  The process is iterative, starting with no entries
   on the shortest path tree, and the router, itself, as the only entry
   in a list of candidate vertices.  The router then loops on the
   following two steps.

     1.  Remove the entry from the candidate list that is closest to
         root, and add it to the shortest path tree.

     2.  Examine the link state advertisement from the entry added to
         the shortest path tree in step 1.  For each neighbor (i.e.,
         router or IP network to which a link connects)

            - If the neighbor is already on the shortest path tree, do
              nothing.

            - If the neighbor is on the candidate list, recalculate the
              distance from root to the neighbor.  Also recalculate the
              next-hop(s) to the neighbor.

            - If the neighbor is not on the candidate list, calculate
              the distance from root to the neighbor and the next-hop(s)
              from root to the neighbor, and add the neighbor to the
              candidate list.

The process terminates when there are no entries on the candidate list.

To take advantage of Directed ARP procedures, the link-state protocol
must provide procedures to advertise that a router accesses two or more
IP networks via the same link.  In addition, the Shortest Path First
calculation is modified to calculate ARP Helper Addresses and recognize
path cost reductions achieved via Directed ARP.

     1.  If a neighbor under consideration is an IP network, and its
         parent (i.e., the entry added to the shortest path tree in step
         1, above) has advertised that the neighbor is reached via the
         same link as a network that is already on the shortest path



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                          [Page 14]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


         tree, the distance from root and next-hop(s) from root to the
         neighbor are the same as the distance and next-hop(s)
         associated with the network already on the shortest path tree.
         If the ARP Helper Address associated with the network that is
         already on the shortest path tree is not NULL, the neighbor
         also inherits the ARP Helper Address from the network that is
         already on the shortest path tree.

     2.  If the calculated next-hop to the neighbor is not NULL, the
         neighbor inherits the ARP Helper Address from its parent.
         Otherwise, except as described in item 1, the ARP Helper
         Address is the IP address of the next-hop to the neighbor's
         parent.  Note that the next-hop to root is NULL.

   For each router or IP network on the shortest path tree, the Shortest
   Path First algorithm described above must calculate one or more
   next-hops that can be used to access the router or IP network.  A
   router that advertises a link to an IP network must include an IP
   address that can be used by other routers on the IP network when
   using the router as a next-hop.  A router might advertise that it was
   connected to two IP networks via the same link by advertising the
   same next-hop IP address for access from both IP networks.  To
   accommodate the address resolution constraints of routers on both IP
   networks the router might advertise two IP addresses (one from each
   IP network) as next-hop IP addresses for access from both IP
   networks.

5.  Robustness

   Hosts and routers can use Directed ARP to resolve third-party next-
   hop addresses; i.e., next-hop addresses learned from a routing
   protocol peer or current next-hop router.  Undetected failure of a
   third party next-hop can result in a routing "black hole".  To avoid
   "black holes", host requirements [5] specify that a host "...MUST be
   able to detect the failure of a 'next-hop' gateway that is listed in
   its route cache and to choose an alternate gateway."  A host may
   receive feedback from protocol layers above IP (e.g., TCP) that
   indicates the status of a next-hop router, and may use other
   procedures (e.g., ICMP echo) to test the status of a next-hop router.
   But the complexity of routing is borne by routers, whose routing
   information must be consistent with the information known to their
   peers.  Routing protocols such as BGP [3], OSPF [4], and others,
   require that routers must stand behind routing information that they
   advertise.  Routers tag routing information with the IP address of
   the router that advertised the information.  If the information
   becomes invalid, the router that advertised the information must
   advertise that the old information is no longer valid.  If a source
   of routing information becomes unavailable, all information received



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                          [Page 15]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


   from that source must be marked as no longer valid.  The complexity
   of dynamic routing protocols stems from procedures to ensure routers
   either receive routing updates sent by a peer, or are able to
   determine that they did not receive the updates (e.g., because
   connectivity to the peer is no longer available).

   Third-party next-hops can also result in "black holes" if the
   underlying link layer network connectivity is not transitive.  For
   example, SMDS filters [9] could be administered to permit
   communication between the SMDS addresses of router R1 and router R2,
   and between the SMDS addresses of router R2 and router R3, and to
   block communication between the SMDS addresses of router R1 and
   router R3.  Router R2 could advertise router R3 as a next-hop to
   router R1, but SMDS filters would prevent direct communication
   between router R1 and router R3.  Non-symmetric filters might permit
   router R3 to send packets to router R1, but block packets sent by
   router R1 addressed to router R3.

   A host or router could verify link level connectivity with a next-hop
   router by sending an ICMP echo to the link level address of the
   next-hop router.  (Note that the ICMP echo is sent directly to the
   link level address of the next-hop router, and is not routed to the
   IP address of the next-hop router.  If the ICMP echo is routed, it
   may follow a path that does not verify link level connectivity.) This
   test could be performed before adding the associated routing table
   entry, or before the first use of the routing table entry.  Detection
   of subsequent changes in link level connectivity is a dynamic routing
   protocol issue and is beyond the scope of this memo.

References

   [1] Piscitello, D., and J. Lawrence, "The Transmission of IP
       Datagrams over the SMDS Service", RFC 1209, Bell Communications
       Research, March 1991.

   [2] Plummer, D., "An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol - or -
       Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48.bit Ethernet Address
       for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware", RFC 826, Symbolics, Inc.,
       November 1982.

   [3] Lougheed, K. and Y. Rekhter, "A Border Gateway Protocol 3 (BGP-
       3)", RFC 1267, cisco Systems and IBM T. J. Watson Research
       Center, October 1991.

   [4] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", RFC 1247, Proteon, Inc., July 1991.

   [5] Braden, R., editor, "Requirements for Internet Hosts --
       Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, USC/Information Sciences



Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                          [Page 16]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


       Institute, October 1989.

   [6] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol - DARPA Internet
       Program Protocol Specification", STD 5, RFC 792, USC/Information
       Sciences Institute, September 1981.

   [7] Dijkstra, E. W., "A Note on Two Problems in Connection with
       Graphs", Numerische Mathematik, Vol. 1, pp. 269-271, 1959.

   [8] McQuillan, J. M., I. Richer, and E. C. Rosen, "The New Routing
       Algorithm for the ARPANET", IEEE Transactions on Communications,
       Vol. COM-28, May 1980.

   [9] "Generic System Requirements In Support of Switched Multi-
       megabit Data Service", Technical Reference TR-TSV-000772, Bell
       Communications Research Technical Reference, Issue 1, May 1991.



































Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                          [Page 17]

RFC 1433                      Directed ARP                    March 1993


Security Considerations

   Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

Authors' Addresses

   John Garrett
   AT&T Bell Laboratories
   184 Liberty Corner Road
   Warren, N.J. 07060-0906

   Phone: (908) 580-4719
   EMail: jwg@garage.att.com


   John Dotts Hagan
   University of Pennsylvania
   Suite 221A
   3401 Walnut Street
   Philadelphia, PA 19104-6228

   Phone: (215) 898-9192
   EMail: Hagan@UPENN.EDU


   Jeffrey A. Wong
   AT&T Bell Laboratories
   184 Liberty Corner Road
   Warren, N.J. 07060-0906

   Phone: (908) 580-5361
   EMail: jwong@garage.att.com



















Garrett, Hagan & Wong                                          [Page 18]
